Wednesday 9 November 2016

How and why does Victoria’s Secret’s model selection process result in the objectification of women?

Wednesday 9 November 2016
2016 has undoubtedly been the year where feminism and body image have been hot topics and with it nearing that time of year again, where the annual Victoria’s Secret Fashion show hits our screen, this year taking place in Paris on November 30th, the show will no doubt get everyone talking.

The morning of the event and days after, my news feed is normally clogged with criticisms about feminism, the models being too thin; the largest being a UK size 6 and how they have unrealistic and unattainable body goals. Don’t get me wrong there are some praises too, as the fashion show is really just for entertainment and celebrating the pop culture.

However, for Victoria’s Secret whose built up its fortune and its image from hoisting up breasts and having their models wear huge sparkly wings, while they walk across the runway, it seems as though they aren’t very keen on the idea of having bodies that represent the majority of women, but instead perpetuates a very narrow and unhealthy ideal of beauty. So I find myself asking How and why does Victoria’s Secret’s model selection process result in the objectification of women?

There seems to be no attempt of body diversity across the company as Monica Mitro – EVP Public relations, Victoria Secret states in Victoria’s Secret – Making of an Angel, “when you see them go into lingerie you see proportions are off and that really stands out when you have 35 of the most beautiful models on the runway.” While watching this video I noticed all the models looked basically the same, I couldn’t really tell one from another. They were mainly all white, blonde and skinny.

How does Victoria’s Secret objectify women?

Victoria’s Secret objectifies women as thousands of models across the world apply to be an angel, but only a small number of them are selected and as the “judges” are only seeing the women as a body and not the personality that comes with it. This ties in to the objectification theory,we live in a society where women view themselves from a third person perspective, as mere objects to be evaluated.” (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997)  Which is exactly what the modelling selection process at Victoria’s Secret does, they look at the personality and facial appearance after looking at the body of the model. This puts a lot of pressure on the models to make sure their models are in top condition, so models go as far to only having liquids one week before the modelling selection or fashion show.

More research has gone into the objectification theory and “research has shown that targets depicted in revealing or sexualized attire elicit more objectifying perceptions compared to targets presented in plain clothing,(Graff, Murnen, & Smolak, 2012; Gurung & Chrouser, 2007). I feel as though Victoria’s Secret sexually objectives women, because if we refer what they are wearing to ‘sexualized attire’, Victoria’s Secret in a way contributes to the porn culture, as their audience (late teenagers/ young adults) are encouraged to engage in self – objectification.

One of Victoria’s Secret objectives is to empower women and make them feel confidence and sexy, however getting the models to walk around on stage and adverts in lingerie and heels, is similar to the attire of prostitutes. This re-enforces the stigma that women are sexualised objects. In Kathy Miriam’s journal: Feminism, Neoilberalism and SultWalk she states: ..a main slogan of SlutWalk – Most often trumpeted by women dressed in Victoria’s Secret lace and stilettos.” Comparing Victoria’s Secret’s posters to high street lingerie posters near me; (La Senza and New Look), the high-street posters seem more relaxed on their models body shape and size. Even the mannequins inside the shop show a more realistic view on the ‘average’ sized woman. Although comparing La Senza and Victoria’s Secret posters they both display that ‘sexual’ desire and aspiration to look like them.



In a way the selection process is similar to (Singh, 1993; Tovee & Cornelissen, 2001) study where they said: “men are more sexually attracted to normal and under –weight women. I feel as though they are selecting women that are ‘under-weight’, so men are more interested in the brand and buy these items for their partner, similar to how the male gaze works.


Source: youtube.com

Victoria’s Secret sparked online criticism back in 2014 with their ‘The Perfect Body’ campaign, which was a play on the name of their new lingerie range ‘body’. The campaign was illustrated with 10 models, with the words ‘The Perfect Body’ across them, all of which have the exact same, very slim body type, failing to celebrate body diversity among women’s bodies by calling one body type ‘perfect.

Over 10,000 people signed a petition for an apology and for the campaign to be taken down as they agreed the campaign was “sending out an unhealthy and damaging messaging about women’s bodies and how they should be judged,” after this Victoria’s Secret changed the slogan to read ‘a body for every body.’ Although I agree it’s a better choice of words, I feel as though the campaign should have at least included a variety of models, even if they aren’t featured on the runway.

There’s no doubt, the brand intentions weren’t to body shame women’s bodies with this campaign but at the time of the campaign being released, unrealistic body images were and still is a controversial topic.


Don’t get me wrong the Victoria’s Secret models are beautiful, I’d be a hypocrite if I said I didn’t care about the way I look to compare with them. Don’t we all, on some level want to be prettier, skinnier, taller? But it’s when people have an unhealthy obsession to become one of them: skip meals, liquid diet in hopes of achieving those 23” waists. Beauty isn’t the end all, there are more important thing to focus on: respect, morals and self belief.

Image: http://bit.ly/2fWyHVu

Another thing that caught my eye when looking at this campaign is the lack of ethnic diversity among the models. All the models featured in the ‘perfect body’ campaign but one is white. Are we there to believe that only white have the ‘perfect body’ and fit the narrow standard of beauty? As well as the petition another response to the campaign came from the lingerie brand Dear Kate. They released their own ‘the perfect body’ advert, which featured a diverse range of women of all sizes and ethnicity.


Earlier on this year, Victoria’s Secret model Erin Heatherton opened up about her decision on why she stopped modelling for them after five years in 2013. In an interview, Erin said: “My last two Victoria’s Secret shows, I was told I had to lose weight…I was struggling with my body image and the pressures to fulfil the demands of perfectionism upon me. I feel as though over the years; young women have felt pressured to look a certain way, I mean the obsession with contour and highlight and eyebrows on ‘fleek’ have gone too far. So it’s no wonder Erin Heatherton felt pressured to lose weight. Todays society is way too involved in what other people think of their own appearanceand I feel as though it’s only going to get worse.

It’s frightening to think the objectification of women is still happening in 2016, although I think it’s getting better (slowly), quite a few men still see women as objects and not as a person, where as men are known as possessions. (Women can I just remind you we DON’T need a man…just remember "Destiny’s Child – Independent women.") Victoria’s Secret objectify women in their selection process by focusing their attention on the shape and size of the models bodies. This puts a lot of pressure for the models to stay in shape and keep up with their workouts and dietsVictoria’s Secret upload their workout videos and diet plans on YouTube, and they are INTENSE! I tried one of their workouts the other day and I had to stop after two minutes. I must say do admire their hard work, I can just about commit to a two-hour netball session once a week.

While I think Victoria’s Secret should relax the criteria size of the models just a tad, I’m not ‘skinny-shaming’ the models, (I’ll admit I’m jealous of their size.) Instead I should be cheering on my fellow women, otherwise I’m no better than them for selecting certain body types.

Due to the amount of press Victoria’s Secret has been getting over the year about body shaming women and the amount of petitions being listened to, I feel as though Victoria’s Secret will one day change the brands image and allow more ‘average’ sized women to walk down the catwalk.


As feminism and body image have been hot topics over the year, I feel as though more and more people are being made aware of these issues and will hopefully encourage fashion brands and designers to think about their model selection and how they advertise their products.


What do you think of Victoria’s Secret model selection? Do you think it will change?


Glow By Friday | Lifestyle, Beauty & Fashion © 2014